- What the five pillars measure and how they're weighted
- Why a forensic finding can cap an otherwise excellent score
- What the score deliberately does not tell you
Everything in the previous five modules is applied mechanically, across the whole listed universe, by the engine behind this site. Knowing how it works tells you what to trust it for — and, more importantly, what not to.
The five pillars
- GrowthWhat it asks: Is revenue and profit compounding, consistently?Where you learned it: Growth quality
- ProfitabilityWhat it asks: Margins and returns on capital, against sector normsWhere you learned it: Margins · ROCE and ROE
- Balance sheetWhat it asks: Leverage, coverage, liquidityWhere you learned it: Debt
- Earnings qualityWhat it asks: Does profit become cash?Where you learned it: Cash flow
- ValuationWhat it asks: Where the multiple sits against the company's own historyWhere you learned it: P/E · Value traps
The forensic layer, and why it can override the rest
Separately from the pillars, a forensic pass runs the checks from Red flags: Piotroski F-Score, promoter pledge, share dilution, other income as a share of profit before tax, debtor-day trends and tax-rate anomalies.
A severe forensic finding caps the overall score, however strong the five pillars look. A company whose profits aren't turning into cash does not get to score well on the strength of those profits.
- 8–10Read it as: Strong on every pillar with a clean forensic pass. Still needs your own work on valuation and fit.
- 6–8Read it as: Good, with identifiable weak spots. Read the pillar breakdown to see which.
- 4–6Read it as: Mixed. Usually one pillar dragging the rest — find out which and whether it matters to you.
- Below 4Read it as: Weak, or capped by a forensic finding. Read the flags before anything else.
What the score cannot do
- It does not know what the business will do next. Every input is historical. A company transforming right now scores on what it used to be.
- It cannot read a management team. Capital allocation judgement, integrity and strategy don't appear in a ratio.
- It cannot see disruption coming. A business with beautiful ten-year numbers can be facing a technology shift that ends it.
- It is not a price target and not advice. A 9/10 company at three times a fair price is still a poor purchase — which is exactly what Module 5 was about.
- It reflects filings. If the filings are misleading, the score built on them is too — which is why the forensic layer exists, and why it's a filter rather than a guarantee.
Treat the score as stage 2 of your routine, done for you across five thousand companies. It narrows the field and tells you where to point your attention.
Then do stages 3, 4 and 5 yourself: read the pillar breakdown to see why the score is what it is, read the flags, form your own valuation view, and write your thesis. The score tells you where to look. It does not tell you what to conclude.
See it live · Every report shows the full pillar breakdown, the forensic findings, the P/E band against its own history and the reverse-DCF implied growth — the reasoning, not just the number.
Open the board →In one screen
- 1Five pillars: growth, profitability, balance sheet, earnings quality, valuation — judged within eight sector frameworks.
- 2A severe forensic finding caps the score regardless of the pillars.
- 3The score is backward-looking and cannot assess management, disruption or price fit.
- 4Use it to narrow the field, then do the judgement yourself.
Check yourself
Nothing is scored or stored — the explanation after each answer is the point.
A company scores 8.4/10 on the pillars but has a severe forensic flag. What happens, and why?
What can the score definitively NOT tell you?